Why the Supreme Court's ballroom ruling could matter beyond the ballroom
• The Supreme Court issued a ruling regarding a White House ballroom dispute that centers on federal appropriations and spending authority. • Georgetown Law professor Stephen Vladeck notes that the case raises critical separation-of-powers questions, as only Congress has the legal standing to litigate such appropriations disputes. • The ruling is significant because it suggests that executive spending challenges may only be pursued during periods of divided government, given the current Congress's reluctance to challenge the administration.
Read story








