Takeaways from a divisive Supreme Court term that expanded Trump’s power

- The Supreme Court concluded a divisive term marked by several rulings that expanded the executive power of President Donald Trump.
- In a 6-3 majority decision, the court ruled that federal courts lack the authority to review the president's decisions regarding the termination of temporary humanitarian protections for people from Haiti and Syria.
- This outcome is significant as it effectively removes judicial oversight from specific presidential actions, limiting the ability of courts to challenge executive mandates.
- The term's conclusion signals a shift toward a "ceasefire" in the public tension between President Trump and the judiciary.
Sources & Citations
1 sourceMore Stories
Committee of Ministers of Council of Europe launches election process for the European Committee of Social Rights - Social Rights
• The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe has officially launched the election process to fill five upcoming vacancies on the European Committee of Social Rights. • The seats, which will become vacant on December 31, 2026, are distributed across three regional groups: two for Group II, one for Group III, and two for Group IV.
Read original · coe.intNewsletter: EU enlargement climbs the political agenda
• EU enlargement has become a primary focus as Ireland begins its EU Council presidency and Brussels prepares for an upcoming budget conference. • President Zelenskyy is facing significant obstacles to Ukraine's accession process due to fresh reservations from Hungary and an ongoing dispute with Poland.
Read original · euronews.com
EuronewsEPP pushes to soften EU carbon market reforms in bid to shield industry
• The European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the European Parliament, is urging the European Commission to soften proposed carbon market reforms. • The group is specifically calling for the extension of free carbon allowances for certain industrial sectors beyond the current 2030 deadline.
Read original · euronews.com
EuronewsEU Budget Commissioner Piotr Serafin criticises ‘frugals’ over proposed long-term budget cuts
• EU Budget Commissioner Piotr Serafin has criticized a group of "frugal" member states for proposing significant spending cuts to the upcoming long-term budget. • The dispute centers on the financial framework for the 2028-2034 period, with these nations pushing for a substantial reduction in overall expenditures.
Read original · euronews.com
EuronewsGerman police raid national football HQ over Euro 2024 corruption allegations | Soccer
• German police raided the national football headquarters following allegations of corruption surrounding the Euro 2024 tournament. • The investigation focuses on "unauthorised favours," specifically regarding the illegal distribution and availability of tournament tickets.
Read original · theguardian.comPolling across six major European economies reveals broad support for carbon pricing - E3G
• A YouGov poll of 6,156 adults across six major European economies—France, Germany, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, and Poland—reveals broad public support for carbon pricing. • The survey was commissioned by a coalition of civil society organizations, including E3G, WWF, and Carbon Market Watch, to advocate for a green industrial transition.
Read original · e3g.org
E3GFive pressing tasks for Ireland as it takes over EU Council presidency
• Ireland has officially commenced its six-month presidency of the EU Council, taking on a leadership role within the European Union. • The presidency faces five critical priorities, including managing EU accession processes and finalizing the union's budget.
Read original · euronews.com
EuronewsA proud history and a cloudy future: Congressional Black Caucus hit by Supreme Court ruling
• The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) faces an uncertain future following a recent Supreme Court ruling that threatens the stability of Black political power in Washington. • As a critical bloc in the U.S. House, the CBC currently holds enough members to represent approximately one-fourth of the votes required to reach a 218-vote majority.
Read original · newsfromthestates.comCommentary: Birthright citizenship ruling was a win for democracy — and a warning about erasing history
• The Supreme Court narrowly upheld birthright citizenship, ruling that being born on U.S. soil grants citizenship regardless of the parents' legal status. • In her opinion, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warned that the case reflects a broader political effort to rewrite history to serve specific ideological aims.
Read original · latimes.comUS Supreme Court ruling on birthright citizenship: What it means for Indian families
• The US Supreme Court rejected Donald Trump's attempt to eliminate birthright citizenship for children born to undocumented immigrants and temporary visa holders. • This ruling ensures that children born in the US to parents on temporary visas, including thousands of Indian H-1B families, retain their constitutional right to American citizenship.
Read original · indianexpress.comSupreme Court ruling in Trump v. Slaughter turbocharges presidential power
• The Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. Slaughter, effectively endorsing the "unitary executive theory" and significantly expanding the legal powers of the U.S. president. • This judicial approval grants the executive branch greater autonomy and control over government functions, reducing the constraints previously placed on presidential authority.
Read original · theconversation.com
The Conversation

