Court

• The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a proposal regarding the Postal Service and mailed ballots for the 2026 elections. • Attorney General Jackson cited Justice Kavanaugh's observation that state and local officials lacked sufficient time to implement the rule before voting began. • This decision prevents immediate changes to mail-in ballot procedures, ensuring stability for election officials and voters during the current cycle.

• A Paris court awarded Kim Kardashian a symbolic €1 payment nearly 10 years after thieves stole jewelry from her hotel room in 2016. • The reality star requested the nominal amount after the original theft involved jewelry valued at over ₹53 crore. • The ruling serves as a legal recognition of the trauma Kardashian experienced during the armed robbery.

• Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed with a majority ruling that the United States Postal Service cannot implement specific mail ballot rules before the 2026 midterm elections. • Kavanaugh indicated in his opinion that he is not closing the door on the USPS enacting these rules at a later date. • This decision prevents the immediate application of Trump-backed ballot rules, affecting how mail-in voting is managed for the upcoming midterms.

• A Seoul court ordered North Korea to pay $32.5 million for the destruction of the Inter-Korean Liaison Office. • North Korean forces blew up the building in June 2020 following a period of rising tensions between the two nations. • The ruling highlights the collapse of diplomatic ties that peaked in 2018 during three summits between Moon Jae-in and Kim Jong Un.

• A South Korean court ordered North Korea to pay 44.6 billion won, or approximately $32.5 million, for destroying a joint liaison office in 2020. • The ruling follows the North's decision to blow up the shared facility during a period of heightened tension between the two nations. • This legal decision reinforces the financial accountability of North Korea for its aggressive actions against South Korean diplomatic infrastructure.

• U.S. Senate Democrats revealed on September 16, 2026, that the Trump administration conducted an operation to search through state voter rolls. • The Department of Justice informed Utah's chief election officer that it has been investigating her since 2025. • These legal pressures and federal investigations create instability for state election officials managing the voting process.

• An international court in The Hague sentenced former Kosovo president Hashim Thaçi to 25 years in prison for war crimes committed during the 1990s conflict with Serbia. • The Trial Panel acquitted Thaçi of crimes against humanity because prosecutors failed to prove a widespread or systematic attack against civilians. • This ruling establishes criminal responsibility for high-level leadership during the violent break from Serbia.

Thaçi held criminally responsible for war crimes during the violent break from Serbia in the 1990s Von der Leyen says “kickstarting Europe’s economy is our number one priority,” as Europe needs to tap into its huge market, world class industries and services.She says its single market remains too fragmented and needs to reform further, with the aim of completing it by the end of next year.“Do we want to rally around our European idea that together we can decide our own destiny? Or do we let our democracies be undermined by the proxies and puppets of authoritarians?Whether it is the ultra nationalist or the anti-European, whether it’s Russian interference or disinformation, the names may be different, but their goal is the same. Continue reading...

• Donald Trump criticized the Supreme Court on Tuesday after the justices rejected his attempt to restrict mail-in voting for the current midterm elections. • Trump posted on social media that the justices who ruled against him were "not the people I interviewed." • The decision ensures that mail-in ballot access remains available to voters who would have been restricted under Trump's proposed rules.

• The US Supreme Court rejected Donald Trump's attempt to allow the US Postal Service to enforce a rule targeting mail-in ballots on Monday. • The conservative-majority court refused to lift an order from US District Judge Indira Talwani that blocked the restrictive measure. • This decision prevents the implementation of tighter mail-in voting rules before the November midterm elections.

• The US Supreme Court blocked an administration attempt to change midterm voting processes, allowing states to continue using mail-in ballots. • Civil rights groups praised the verdict after the administration made a last-ditch effort to alter how voters cast their ballots. • This decision ensures that millions of voters can maintain their current access to mail-in voting options for the upcoming elections.

• The US Supreme Court refused to revive President Donald Trump's attempt to restrict mail-in voting for the November midterm elections. • Trump criticized the conservative justices he appointed, calling the court's decision "horrible" and "highly political." • US Attorney General Todd Blanche confirmed that the administration will comply with the ruling, ensuring current mail-in ballot rules remain in place for voters.

• The Supreme Court rejected the Trump administration's attempt to impose severe restrictions on mail-in voting just weeks before the midterm elections. • In a 7-2 decision, the court upheld a lower court's injunction that prevents the United States Postal Service from implementing new rules regarding who can receive a mail-in ballot. • This ruling prevents the implementation of restrictions that election officials warned would upend the voting process for citizens in November.

• The U.S. Supreme Court blocked an attempt by the Trump administration to impose federal control over mail-in voting before the midterm elections. • The blocked executive order sought to create a federal voter database and threatened election officials with criminal prosecution or loss of federal funding for noncompliance. • This ruling prevents the federal government from restricting the United States Postal Service to transmitting ballots only to voters on a specific federal list.

Scandal explodes as country’s election campaign peaks, with polls suggesting dead heat between candidatesBrazil’s supreme court has been thrust into what experts consider the greatest crisis since the return of democracy in the 1980s, as two rival judges lock horns on the eve of the presidential election with unpredictable consequences for Latin America’s largest democracy.The politically charged dispute exploded into public view on Tuesday as judges traded insults and accusations during a heated supreme court hearing that was livestreamed into millions of Brazilian homes. Continue reading...

Election officials continue push to assure Americans mail ballots are safe after supreme court rules against presidentReader Q&A: how united are the Democrats ahead of the midterms? Post your questions nowAfter the US supreme court halted Donald Trump’s efforts to make it significantly harder to vote by mail in the midterms, US election officials are redoubling their efforts to convince Americans it is safe to cast their ballots by mail.The supreme court’s Monday ruling, which sent Trump into an angry froth on Truth Social, averted what election officials of both parties said would be an administrative disaster for this year’s elections. Trump’s order would have required states to comply with cumbersome new rules, including redesigning mail-in envelopes and uploading lists of voters to the USPS, that were not feasible to implement before ballots started going out. The effort was seen as a push by the government to change voting policy as well as one to weaken confidence in voting by mail. Continue reading...

• The US Supreme Court refused to allow the Postal Service to enforce new restrictions on mail-in ballots for the congressional midterm elections. • The court rebuffed a request from the Trump administration to intervene after several states had already launched early voting. • This decision ensures that current mail-in voting processes remain intact for voters and election officials during the midterm cycle.

• The Supreme Court rejected Donald Trump’s attempt to restrict the use of mail-in ballots for the midterm elections. • The court's decision allows states to maintain the same mail ballot processes they have used for years. • This ruling ensures that current voting procedures remain unchanged for voters and election officials during the active election cycle.

• The Supreme Court denied a request on September 14, 2026, to allow a Trump administration plan to change mail-in voting rules before the midterm elections. • The Court's order blocks the government from overturning a District Court preliminary injunction that had previously stopped the policy changes. • This decision ensures that current mail voting procedures remain in place for voters and election officials during the upcoming election cycle.

• The Supreme Court rejected a request from the Trump administration to implement mail-in voting restrictions for the midterm general election. • The court blocked the administration's attempt to apply these limits under a specific U.S. Postal Service plan. • This decision prevents the government from restricting how voters use mail-in ballots during the upcoming midterm elections.

• A court blocked a last-minute effort by President Trump to change the rules regarding the use of mail ballots. • Washington State elections director Stuart Holmes noted that ballots were already printed, making a shift in rules very costly. • The ruling prevents election officials from having to execute contingency plans, such as the one in Weber County, Utah, to abandon mail voting entirely.

• The Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump’s plan on Monday to change how mail-in ballots are sent to voters for the current midterm elections. • Election officials warned that the proposed changes would have had catastrophic consequences for the voting process. • The ruling prevents the implementation of rules that Republican attorneys general sought but their own election officials claimed they could not execute.

• The U.S. Supreme Court rejected an attempt by the Trump administration to limit mail voting through new Postal Service regulations for the midterm elections. • The blocked plan would have allowed the Postal Service to refuse delivery of ballots to states that failed to use a uniform envelope style or submit voter lists to a new online portal. • This decision prevents the potential disenfranchisement of millions of voters in an election that will determine which party controls Congress.

• The Supreme Court rejected a bid by Donald Trump on Monday to restrict the use of mail ballots for the midterm elections. • The League of Women Voters, a plaintiff in the case, called the proposed rules an extraordinary attempt to interfere with voting. • This decision prevents the implementation of rules that the League of Women Voters warned would throw elections into chaos.

• The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday that states must continue sending out mail ballots using their existing long-term processes. • The decision follows a challenge by Democratic state officials and voting rights groups who argued the president lacked the constitutional authority to restrict mail voting. • This ruling ensures that mail-in voting remains available to voters and prevents the federal government from using Postal Service control to eliminate the practice before a major election.

• The Supreme Court declined on Monday to allow the U.S. Postal Service to enforce a rule that would have restricted mail-in ballots. • This decision blocks an effort by President Donald Trump to limit voting by mail before the upcoming November midterm elections. • The ruling ensures that current mail-in voting processes remain available for voters in the elections that will determine control of Congress.

Comments come after court on Monday rejected the president’s mail ballot restrictions ahead of the November midterm electionsSupreme court rejects Trump’s mail ballot restrictions for midterm electionsDonald Trump is facing a rare backlash from the US Congress as Democrats and some Republicans push for guardrails on the world’s most powerful AI companies.Concerns over the dangerous potential of AI reached fever pitch this week after tech leaders sounded the alarm over the rapid advancement of the technology and its potential threat to humanity.Mitch McConnell, the 84-year-old former Senate majority leader from Kentucky, was seen in Washington for the first time in months on Monday, minutes before his office released a statement saying that he was back at work.With a slip of the tongue reminiscent of Joe Biden, Gavin Newsom, California’s Democratic governor, told CNN that he would not run for president in 2028 if his fellow Californian, former vice-president Kamala Harris, decides to run again, since “I know what that means: I know her base of supporters, I know her friends, the zen diagram on that is just pure crossover.”Donald Trump claimed there is a “SICK conspiracy” against artificial intelligence and data centers in response to the growing calls for greater checks on AI development.In a statement posted on social media, Barack Obama, the former US president, called for the pace of AI development to be slowed to allow time for the federal government to develop regulations to address “serious safety concerns”. Continue reading...

• Supreme Court Justice nominee Kim Seong-Su expressed regret on the 14th for an oversight that caused public concern. • Kim stated that he will closely read the changes of the times to help the judiciary move in step with current societal shifts. • This commitment suggests a willingness to adapt judicial interpretations to align with rapidly changing social norms.