Image: Watts Up With That?Climate consensus research is the worst, most invalid research ever published in journals - Watts Up With That?
• The website "Watts Up With That?" has published a critique claiming that research measuring climate change consensus is "the worst, most invalid research ever published." • The author argues that the methodology—using keyword searches and abstract reviews by political activists—is scientifically unsound and lacks epistemic standing. • This critique highlights a perceived collapse of scientific standards within peer-reviewed journals, comparing the research process to using "crystals" or a "Ouija board."
wattsupwiththat.com