Supreme Court

• The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday to uphold the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) authority to use "disgorgement" to recover illegal profits. • This decision preserves a critical financial remedy used by the Wall Street watchdog to strip wrongdoers of illicit gains. • The ruling follows a separate 2024 decision where the Court limited the SEC by rejecting its ability to handle certain securities fraud penalty proceedings in-house.

Justices uphold FCC authority to impose in-house penalties, rejecting AT&T and Verizon jury trial claimsSign up for the Breaking News US newsletter emailThe US supreme court backed the Federal Communications Commission’s system for levying fines, ruling on Thursday against wireless carriers AT&T and Verizon in their challenge to the agency and handing a win to Donald Trump’s administration.The ruling was 8-1. At issue in the legal dispute was whether the agency’s in-house proceedings for imposing the penalties deprived the companies of their right to a jury trial under the US constitution. Trump’s administration defended the FCC’s system for assessing financial penalties, known as forfeiture orders. Continue reading...

• The Supreme Court of India issued a series of landmark judgments in May 2026, covering diverse legal areas including electoral integrity, human trafficking, and property law. • Key rulings include the upholding of Bihar's electoral roll revision, the extension of the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), and the issuance of a comprehensive Victim Protection Plan for human trafficking survivors. • The Court further clarified critical legal frameworks regarding bail jurisprudence, the Benami Act, and gender equality within matrimonial law.

Court decision that represents win for Republicans comes after lengthy battle over state’s congressional mapSign up for the Breaking News US newsletter emailAlabama can use a redrawn congressional map that eliminates one of the state’s two majority-Black districts in this year’s midterm elections, the US supreme court ruled in a 6-3 decision on Tuesday, another major blow to Black voters and a win for Republicans.The court’s emergency ruling is the most consequential decision it had issued since its landmark ruling in late April that struck down a critical provision of the Voting Rights Act. In that case, Louisiana v Callais, the court’s majority made it nearly impossible to win Voting Rights Act claims, saying that plaintiffs had to prove intentional discrimination. But on 26 May, a three-judge panel said the map Alabama wants to use for this year’s midterm was enacted with discriminatory intent. Continue reading...

• SCOTUSblog says several of the term’s most important cases remain undecided as the Supreme Court heads into its final stretch. • The article highlights the legal fight involving Cook, who is challenging Trump’s mortgage fraud allegations after lower courts required the dispute to proceed in federal court. • The remaining decisions matter because they could shape executive power, financial regulation and other high-stakes policy questions before the Court.

• On May 27, the Supreme Court upheld the Election Commission of India’s authority to conduct Special Intensive Revisions of electoral rolls to ensure voter list accuracy. • The ruling reinforces that citizenship is the fundamental basis for voting rights, aiming to prevent non-citizens and illegal immigrants from participating in elections. • This decision is significant as it validates the Commission's power to remove ineligible names, thereby tackling illegal immigration through administrative scrutiny.

• The Supreme Court upheld the Election Commission’s powers regarding Bihar’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise to identify and remove fake voters from electoral rolls. • While Justice Surya Kant noted that exclusion from voter lists does not formally strip a person of their citizenship, the court left unresolved whether procedural legality can lead to the democratic exclusion of marginalized citizens. • The ruling carries significant stakes as the West Bengal Chief Minister has announced that individuals excluded from the rolls will be denied access to government welfare schemes.