Upholds

• The Supreme Court upheld the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise, affirming its authority to verify citizenship to ensure free and fair elections. • Key measures approved include the use of Aadhaar cards as an indicative document for verification and the publication of a list containing approximately 65 lakh excluded electors in Bihar. • The court ruled that a prior entry in the electoral roll does not prevent the EC from conducting fresh inquiries, rejecting claims that names cannot be deleted without prior notice under Rule 21A of the 1960 Rules.

• The Supreme Court, in a bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, upheld the Election Commission of India's (ECI) Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise for voter rolls. • The court ruled that the SIR is constitutional and cannot be termed "ultra vires" or illegal simply because it employs a process distinct from routine statutory voter revisions. • This decision validates the ECI's authority to implement a more rigorous rehaul of electoral rolls to ensure accuracy and legitimacy in the voting process.

• The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday to uphold the Election Commission's authority to carry out the S.I.R. exercise. • This judicial decision serves as a significant legal setback for opposition parties who had challenged the commission's power. • The ruling is critical as it reinforces the Election Commission's regulatory control over electoral processes and administrative exercises.

• The BJP has criticized the INDIA bloc, calling for "self-introspection" after the Supreme Court upheld the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar. • BJP spokesperson Trivedi stated that the apex court clarified the SIR is essential for ensuring free and fair elections and falls within the Election Commission's constitutional jurisdiction. • The ruling is a significant blow to the opposition's challenges against the electoral roll revision process in the state.

• The US Supreme Court voted 6-3 to uphold the authority of the Preventive Services Task Force to recommend which healthcare services must be covered with no cost-sharing under the Affordable Care Act. • The ruling affirms that the independent medical body retains power to determine preventive care coverage standards for millions of Americans with ACA insurance plans. • The decision impacts ongoing healthcare policy debates as seventy-five national medical organizations simultaneously urged the Senate to adopt Medicare physician payment provisions in the budget reconciliation package.

• The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to uphold the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force’s authority to recommend no-cost preventive services under the Affordable Care Act. • The decision overturned a district judge’s injunction that had blocked the administration from enforcing grant flow restorations related to the task force. • The ruling preserves mandates for insurers to cover recommended screenings and vaccines without patient cost-sharing, impacting millions of Americans.