Court Term

• The Supreme Court concluded its 2025–2026 term with a primary focus on the scope and limits of executive power. • In the *Slaughter* case, the Court affirmed broad presidential control over most "independent" federal agencies. • Conversely, in *Cook*, Chief Justice Roberts ruled against Donald Trump's attempt to fire a Federal Reserve official, citing a need for judicial checks to prevent arbitrary removals.

• The U.S. Supreme Court has concluded its current term and entered summer recess until October. • The term was marked by several high-profile rulings that resulted in a mix of legal victories and defeats for former President Donald Trump. • These decisions are significant as they shape the legal landscape and provide insight into the current ideological leanings of the justices.

• A panel of legal experts reviewed the Supreme Court's recent term, characterizing it as a period of "judicial supremacy" that significantly eroded the legislative power of Congress. • Key legal setbacks highlighted include the gutting of the Voting Rights Act in *Callais and Milligan* and the expansion of "unitary executive" power in *Trump v. Slaughter*. • Experts argue the Court has rewritten the Reconstruction Amendments and increasingly allowed its "shadow docket" to influence formal merits decisions without sufficient justification.

• The U.S. Supreme Court concluded a historic term characterized by landmark opinions and a heavy reliance on the "shadow docket" for emergency rulings. • Key legal battles focused on the intersection of gun rights and property rights, specifically through cases such as US v. Hemani and Wolford v. Lopez. • The term's decisions are significant as they address critical national issues, including the definition of U.S. citizenship and the impact of political policies on judicial rulings.

• The U.S. Supreme Court concluded its 2025 term with several landmark rulings focused on constitutional interpretation and federal authority. • In Trump v. Slaughter, the Court overruled a 1935 precedent to grant the president power to remove commissioners of "independent" federal agencies, strengthening the separation of powers. • The Court expanded First Amendment protections by ruling in favor of a Colorado therapist in Chiles v. Salazar and striking down campaign spending restrictions in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission.

• A new poll reveals that a majority of Americans now disapprove of the U.S. Supreme Court following the conclusion of its latest judicial term. • The data shows a stark ideological divide, with every liberal justice maintaining a positive favorability rating while every conservative justice holds a net negative rating. • This decline in public trust follows a series of controversial rulings that critics argue have eroded civil rights and expanded the presidential powers of Donald Trump.

• The Center for American Progress argues that the Supreme Court's 2025–2026 term advanced a far-right agenda that undermines the U.S. Constitution and democratic interests. • The analysis claims the Court has prioritized powerful special interests over the American people and has become unbound by ethical standards. • To counter this perceived judicial activism, the report suggests implementing disempowering legislation and removing the Court's jurisdiction over specific cases.