Supreme

• The US Supreme Court refused to revive President Donald Trump's attempt to restrict mail-in voting for the November midterm elections. • Trump criticized the conservative justices he appointed, calling the court's decision "horrible" and "highly political." • US Attorney General Todd Blanche confirmed that the administration will comply with the ruling, ensuring current mail-in ballot rules remain in place for voters.

• The US Supreme Court blocked an administration attempt to change midterm voting processes, allowing states to continue using mail-in ballots. • Civil rights groups praised the verdict after the administration made a last-ditch effort to alter how voters cast their ballots. • This decision ensures that millions of voters can maintain their current access to mail-in voting options for the upcoming elections.

• The US Supreme Court rejected Donald Trump's attempt to allow the US Postal Service to enforce a rule targeting mail-in ballots on Monday. • The conservative-majority court refused to lift an order from US District Judge Indira Talwani that blocked the restrictive measure. • This decision prevents the implementation of tighter mail-in voting rules before the November midterm elections.

• Donald Trump criticized the Supreme Court on Tuesday after the justices rejected his attempt to restrict mail-in voting for the current midterm elections. • Trump posted on social media that the justices who ruled against him were "not the people I interviewed." • The decision ensures that mail-in ballot access remains available to voters who would have been restricted under Trump's proposed rules.

Scandal explodes as country’s election campaign peaks, with polls suggesting dead heat between candidatesBrazil’s supreme court has been thrust into what experts consider the greatest crisis since the return of democracy in the 1980s, as two rival judges lock horns on the eve of the presidential election with unpredictable consequences for Latin America’s largest democracy.The politically charged dispute exploded into public view on Tuesday as judges traded insults and accusations during a heated supreme court hearing that was livestreamed into millions of Brazilian homes. Continue reading...

• The Supreme Court rejected Donald Trump’s attempt to restrict the use of mail-in ballots for the midterm elections. • The court's decision allows states to maintain the same mail ballot processes they have used for years. • This ruling ensures that current voting procedures remain unchanged for voters and election officials during the active election cycle.

• The US Supreme Court refused to allow the Postal Service to enforce new restrictions on mail-in ballots for the congressional midterm elections. • The court rebuffed a request from the Trump administration to intervene after several states had already launched early voting. • This decision ensures that current mail-in voting processes remain intact for voters and election officials during the midterm cycle.

• The Supreme Court declined on Monday to allow the U.S. Postal Service to enforce a rule that would have restricted mail-in ballots. • This decision blocks an effort by President Donald Trump to limit voting by mail before the upcoming November midterm elections. • The ruling ensures that current mail-in voting processes remain available for voters in the elections that will determine control of Congress.

• The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday that states must continue sending out mail ballots using their existing long-term processes. • The decision follows a challenge by Democratic state officials and voting rights groups who argued the president lacked the constitutional authority to restrict mail voting. • This ruling ensures that mail-in voting remains available to voters and prevents the federal government from using Postal Service control to eliminate the practice before a major election.

• The Supreme Court rejected a bid by Donald Trump on Monday to restrict the use of mail ballots for the midterm elections. • The League of Women Voters, a plaintiff in the case, called the proposed rules an extraordinary attempt to interfere with voting. • This decision prevents the implementation of rules that the League of Women Voters warned would throw elections into chaos.

• The U.S. Supreme Court rejected an attempt by the Trump administration to limit mail voting through new Postal Service regulations for the midterm elections. • The blocked plan would have allowed the Postal Service to refuse delivery of ballots to states that failed to use a uniform envelope style or submit voter lists to a new online portal. • This decision prevents the potential disenfranchisement of millions of voters in an election that will determine which party controls Congress.

• The Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump’s plan on Monday to change how mail-in ballots are sent to voters for the current midterm elections. • Election officials warned that the proposed changes would have had catastrophic consequences for the voting process. • The ruling prevents the implementation of rules that Republican attorneys general sought but their own election officials claimed they could not execute.

• The Supreme Court rejected a request from the Trump administration to implement mail-in voting restrictions for the midterm general election. • The court blocked the administration's attempt to apply these limits under a specific U.S. Postal Service plan. • This decision prevents the government from restricting how voters use mail-in ballots during the upcoming midterm elections.

• The Supreme Court denied a request on September 14, 2026, to allow a Trump administration plan to change mail-in voting rules before the midterm elections. • The Court's order blocks the government from overturning a District Court preliminary injunction that had previously stopped the policy changes. • This decision ensures that current mail voting procedures remain in place for voters and election officials during the upcoming election cycle.

Comments come after court on Monday rejected the president’s mail ballot restrictions ahead of the November midterm electionsSupreme court rejects Trump’s mail ballot restrictions for midterm electionsDonald Trump is facing a rare backlash from the US Congress as Democrats and some Republicans push for guardrails on the world’s most powerful AI companies.Concerns over the dangerous potential of AI reached fever pitch this week after tech leaders sounded the alarm over the rapid advancement of the technology and its potential threat to humanity.Mitch McConnell, the 84-year-old former Senate majority leader from Kentucky, was seen in Washington for the first time in months on Monday, minutes before his office released a statement saying that he was back at work.With a slip of the tongue reminiscent of Joe Biden, Gavin Newsom, California’s Democratic governor, told CNN that he would not run for president in 2028 if his fellow Californian, former vice-president Kamala Harris, decides to run again, since “I know what that means: I know her base of supporters, I know her friends, the zen diagram on that is just pure crossover.”Donald Trump claimed there is a “SICK conspiracy” against artificial intelligence and data centers in response to the growing calls for greater checks on AI development.In a statement posted on social media, Barack Obama, the former US president, called for the pace of AI development to be slowed to allow time for the federal government to develop regulations to address “serious safety concerns”. Continue reading...

• Supreme Court Justice nominee Kim Seong-Su expressed regret on the 14th for an oversight that caused public concern. • Kim stated that he will closely read the changes of the times to help the judiciary move in step with current societal shifts. • This commitment suggests a willingness to adapt judicial interpretations to align with rapidly changing social norms.

Decision allows states to send ballots under process followed for years even as president tried to limit systemThe supreme court on Monday rejected Donald Trump’s mail ballot restrictions for now, capping a flurry of last-minute legal action with voting in the midterm elections already underway.The decision allows states to continue sending out mail ballots under the same processes they have used for years. Continue reading...

• A three-judge panel nominated by Joe Biden refused to lift an injunction on Thursday regarding the Trump administration's proposed mail ballot changes. • The judges ruled that the president lacks the legal authority to regulate election policies managed by individual states. • This decision prevents the federal government from unilaterally altering how mail-in ballots are handled before the upcoming midterm elections.

• The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a request to implement congressional maps in Missouri that were backed by Donald Trump. • This decision follows a legal battle over the state's district boundaries that has lasted for more than a year. • The ruling prevents Republicans from using their preferred map to determine how voters are distributed across the state's congressional seats.

• The US Supreme Court has rejected a push to use Missouri congressional maps backed by President Donald Trump, dealing a loss to Republicans trying to maintain control. • The rejection involves maps that would have favored Republican candidates, with the court's decision marking a second time it has turned down the proposed maps. • The loss affects Republican efforts to maintain control of Congress, as the rejected maps would have potentially given them an advantage in Missouri's congressional districts.

• The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a request to implement congressional maps in Missouri that were backed by Donald Trump. • The proposed maps were specifically drawn to help Republicans gain an additional seat in the U.S. House of Representatives. • This decision limits the ability of Republicans to increase their control of the House ahead of the November midterm elections.

Latest decision appears to set the stage for the state to use its old electoral maps this yearThe US supreme court again rejected a push backed by Donald Trump to overhaul Missouri’s congressional maps in a bid to hand Republicans an edge in November’s midterm elections.Its latest ruling, after days of confusion following conflicting decisions, appears to set the stage for the state to use its old electoral maps this year. Continue reading...

Opponents requested an emergency filing as state’s elections plunged into uncertainty over redrawn districtsOpponents of congressional redistricting in Missouri appealed to the US supreme court on Wednesday after a federal panel let stand a ruling allowing the state to use a new map backed by Donald Trump in November’s midterms.The map’s challengers, including a group ‌opposed to the Republican-drawn map called ​People Not Politicians, made the request in an emergency ⁠filing, moving swiftly ​after Stephen Clark, a St ​Louis-based chief ​US district ​judge, ‌ ​issued his ​decision on Tuesday. Continue reading...

• The Supreme Court issued several rulings on September 8, 2026, including the acquittal of a man previously convicted of raping a five-year-old. • The court overturned the conviction because the victim failed to identify the accused person during the trial proceedings. • In a separate ruling, the court upheld a Karnataka rule allowing people to approach human rights courts directly without first going to a commission.

Decision marks setback for president and Republicans, who set in motion national redistricting battle last yearThe US supreme court refused an emergency appeal by Missouri officials to use a newly drawn congressional map backed by Donald Trump in the November midterm election, letting stand a ruling by the state’s highest state court that blocked the new lines from taking effect.Last week the Missouri supreme court ruled that the map must go before voters to approve or reject the new districts, meaning it cannot be used in the November election. Trump and Republicans fumed over the decision, with the president calling it “horrible, ridiculous, and unConstitutional”. Continue reading...

• House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries recently stated that Democrats would pursue dramatic Supreme Court reforms if they regain control of the House. • Jeffries announced that Representative Jamie Raskin would lead these efforts as Judiciary Committee chairman and refused to rule out expanding the number of justices on the Court. • These proposed structural changes could permanently alter the constitutional order by shifting the political balance of the nation's highest court.

Legal fight continues as states begin sending out ballots for voters to vote by mail in November’s midterm electionsThe Trump administration renewed its appeal to the US supreme court on Sunday to allow restrictions on mail-in voting, after a federal judge had blocked new limits on such ballots, just ahead of November’s midterm elections.The latest filing follows a decision by US district court judge Indira Talwani on Friday to extend a court order preventing the US Postal Service (USPS) from enforcing Donald Trump’s executive order.The Associated Press contributed reporting Continue reading...

• Democrats in Congress renewed calls to expand the U.S. Supreme Court from nine to 13 justices ahead of the midterm elections. • The House Committee on the Judiciary advanced legislation intended to protect the court's legitimacy and preserve the system of checks and balances. • This move seeks to ensure American rights remain secure regardless of which political party holds power.