Million Super

• Un fondo di riserva di un super PAC da 140 milioni di dollari è pronto ad attaccare il democratico dell'Ohio Sherrod Brown, mentre quest'ultimo punta al ritorno in Senato nel 2026. • I finanziamenti provenienti da donatori repubblicani mirano a mettere in risalto il record di voto di Brown e le sue politiche economiche in questo stato chiave. • L'escalation è cruciale per la difesa della ristretta maggioranza del GOP in Senato in un contesto di elezioni di metà mandato ad alta tensione.

• Un super PAC con un fondo di guerra di 140 milioni di dollari si prepara a sfidare il senatore democratico dell'Ohio nel ciclo elettorale del 2026. • Il finanziamento mira a impedire il ritorno dell'incumbent, intensificando le strategie repubblicane come riportato l'8 maggio 2026. • Questa potenza finanziaria sottolinea l'importanza strategica del controllo del Senato in coincidenza con l'attenzione di Trump per le elezioni di metà mandato.

• A newly formed super PAC aligned with Republicans has amassed a $140 million war chest aimed at defeating an incumbent Ohio Democrat seeking to return to the Senate in 2026, according to campaign‑finance disclosures. • The Democrat, who previously served multiple terms in the Senate and is viewed as a key target in the GOP’s strategy to expand its majority, faces a crowded primary and is under pressure on several policy fronts. • Democrats warn that the spending could overwhelm small‑donor‑based campaigns and reshape the state’s media landscape, while Republicans argue the money will keep the candidate’s record under scrutiny.

• A $140 million super PAC war chest is poised to challenge Ohio Democrat Sherrod Brown's 2026 Senate return. • Funded by Republican donors, the group aims to exploit Brown's vulnerabilities in a key battleground. • This escalation underscores high stakes for Senate control amid Trump's midterm focus.

As living costs rise, the state where Gates and Bezos made billions is targeting top earners – could other states follow?Noel Frame knows exactly how difficult it is to raise taxes on the ultra-wealthy, because she has been trying to do just that – first as an activist, then as a state legislator – for the past 15 years. And until recently almost all of her efforts ended in failure.She lives in Washington, a solid blue state that should, in theory, be hospitable to the idea of more progressive taxation and has plenty of multi-millionaires to target, since it is the home of Microsoft, Amazon and an array of other tech-driven corporations. While the wealth of these tech giants has grown exponentially in recent decades, the state – which levies no income taxes – has struggled to bring in enough revenue to pay for basic services like public schooling and long-term healthcare. Continue reading...